How about all cabinet members that provide nothing for the district but are putting us further in the hole, financially? Do we really need a deputy superintendent?
Is it concerning that the Dir of Technology is getting the axe?
I’m happy to see other admin positions going by the wayside. Not so much the sped and art teachers. I don’t know what adapt phys ed is, but if it is for differently-abled kids, I don’t like it. Unless there is a performance problem with these teachers, of course. I think Turner’s sister and all the other bs admin roles should be axed before a single student-facing position is.
This Board feels so corrupt for the kind of city we live in and the values we purport to have. I really want to know who is teaching them how to circumvent all these rules (if not literally, then the spirit of them).
Tom, appreciate all your effort to educate us. Recall reading lots of revenue spent on equity - education / admin / consultants etc. Was that the main cause for the $ crunch ?
How about all cabinet members that provide nothing for the district but are putting us further in the hole, financially? Do we really need a deputy superintendent?
Is it concerning that the Dir of Technology is getting the axe?
I’m happy to see other admin positions going by the wayside. Not so much the sped and art teachers. I don’t know what adapt phys ed is, but if it is for differently-abled kids, I don’t like it. Unless there is a performance problem with these teachers, of course. I think Turner’s sister and all the other bs admin roles should be axed before a single student-facing position is.
This Board feels so corrupt for the kind of city we live in and the values we purport to have. I really want to know who is teaching them how to circumvent all these rules (if not literally, then the spirit of them).
Tom, appreciate all your effort to educate us. Recall reading lots of revenue spent on equity - education / admin / consultants etc. Was that the main cause for the $ crunch ?