I think the problem is that the recourse is civil - so someone would have to sue. I can't imagine anyone in town wants to be the person who sues to stop the fifth ward school.
The City did the same thing with reparations, which is basically: we can do whatever we want as long as nobody sues. But eventually, someone there sued them and now its a big mess.
If they're in violation of the law, why wouldn't they be charged as such?
I think the problem is that the recourse is civil - so someone would have to sue. I can't imagine anyone in town wants to be the person who sues to stop the fifth ward school.
The City did the same thing with reparations, which is basically: we can do whatever we want as long as nobody sues. But eventually, someone there sued them and now its a big mess.