Yes, any future D65 candidates who bill themselves as progressives need to admit the terrible mistakes of their predecessors and tell how they would operate differently (such as valuing the quality of Supt candidate experience over a candidate's ethnicity, recognizing that valuing education fundamentals is needed even for progressives, p…
Yes, any future D65 candidates who bill themselves as progressives need to admit the terrible mistakes of their predecessors and tell how they would operate differently (such as valuing the quality of Supt candidate experience over a candidate's ethnicity, recognizing that valuing education fundamentals is needed even for progressives, pledging open search processes and town halls to actually seek out feedback rather than just holding forums to push decisions down the pike, valuing fiscal responsibility, etc.).
Yes, any future D65 candidates who bill themselves as progressives need to admit the terrible mistakes of their predecessors and tell how they would operate differently (such as valuing the quality of Supt candidate experience over a candidate's ethnicity, recognizing that valuing education fundamentals is needed even for progressives, pledging open search processes and town halls to actually seek out feedback rather than just holding forums to push decisions down the pike, valuing fiscal responsibility, etc.).