Discussion about this post

Commenting has been turned off for this post
Will's avatar

Thank you for your reporting, Tom, and for so thoughtfully expressing your anger and frustration and channeling it so productively. Sadly, your critique rings very true. It's simply not enough for Evanston's leaders to espouse progressive ideals and launch progressive programs. If those programs are not implemented in a careful, sustainable way, then the result becomes self-defeating. Worst of all, the most vulnerable in our community -- often the ones these programs are claiming to try to help -- are the ones who will be hurt the most when they fail.

In my view, there are far too many signs that local leaders are using talking points to bolster their own ambitions or sense of self instead of seeing things through. When their inattentiveness and cronyism leads to predictably messy consequences, these leaders then distance themselves for fear of public criticism and political fallout. Which might partly explain the absence of Biss as any kind of reliable on-the-ground presence in the Bessie Rhodes travesty -- he can co-sign a letter, but it seems he doesn't want to actually get near the situation for fear of damage to his public standing. (Disclosure: I have had personal disappointment with his sporadic engagement on another community issue.)

When talk isn't enough, because IT IS NOT ENOUGH . . .

When government transparency is all too limited . . .

When community feedback is more often used to bolster an agenda rather than to build on it or re-work it . . .

And when progressive programs and initiatives falter due to lack of sustainable implementation . . .

...then those who oppose these measures and ideals, locally and nationally, will try to claim that they don't and cannot work. They can work, and they must. It's not the intention at fault here, it's the implementation.

It is time for a genuine reconsideration and reckoning to ensure that our government is actually working for the people who need it most, not just the people who are running it.

Expand full comment
Christian Sorensen's avatar

Tom, thank you for the bait.

In no world is this comparison real, this comparing Evanston's school elections in 2017/2018 and this election really lets me know you didn't get enough data from Wisconsin or Michigan or even from GOP voters in Illinois.

Lots of people are annoyed that Democrats nationally didn't do what we promised (student loans, reverse anti-choice moves, protect the environment) and we look feckless and silly. However, years of political organizing and working campaigns has also taught me to never try to broad strokes any of this because you cannot be correct.

I can tell you locally that not only has the state and county and even parts of the city done a TON since 2016 and Trump 45, but that Evanston's schools screwups don't need a larger analogy. Jan Schakowsky cares a ton about D65, Robyn Gabel's granddaughter is about to enter next year with my kid too, D65 is all everyone has ever talked about when we got past the national race (a thing about Evanston Democrats that everyone around the county and state know is that we are utterly pillar to post, we go from hyperlocal to national and we have a hard time thinking about much in between.)

We had (have? had) terrible governance because we had terrible governance. We aren't going to get our spending down by more than 8% by analogizing to a national political movement. We aren't going to close our achievement gap with just Evanston and the President either.

Nobody got hosed Tuesday, the DCCC/DSCC/DNC didn't do their jobs nationwide, and DPI was focused elsewhere, JB was running pro-choice amendments in 10 states, and then (I know this sounds dumb) but we'll have a bunch of mail-in ballots, something like over 360,000 that will come in 4:1 blue in Illinois and then it rained in the afternoon/evening of election day in a state and region that everyone "knew" it was already going one way.

Looking forward, a major part of our state-level education agenda is expanding preK. The state will also be dealing with a $3.1 billion-ish budget deficit and a transit reform package that needs funding. There was talk of a statewide school infrastructure bill, a la Build Illinois Bond style, but thats likely delayed. Clearly we can expect little to no help from a Trump DoE (if they keep one). We'll have to dig us out ourselves and thats gonna take the better part of a decade.

D65's current situation is way more analogous to digging out of Blago/Rauner budget holes than it is to Democratic politics of the 2024 cycle. We let charisma and an incomplete vision that most of the body politic agreed with become the north star. It happened, now it is time to dig out. Pretending that anyone could have stopped this from happening that wasn't in the room at the time is not anywhere near close to reality.

Expand full comment
109 more comments...