2 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tom Hayden's avatar

Well, they did include those costs, but I didn't copy paste the full thing because I was only talking about construction costs, since the lease certificate can *only* be used on construction and general funds can *only* be used on not-construction.

With that said, I think its bullshit that the interpretation of the statute is that the voters have to approve construction, which only means physical building structures and not all the stuff that goes along with that. It seems like a pedantic loophole.

Expand full comment
Angela's avatar

I think the fact they haven’t presented you a full budget speaks volumes about their incompetency. Zero clue. The fact there is literally no one at the district with a smidge of experience in this is like handing over the keys to vault of cash and saying have fun. Your expectation of oversight can’t be third parties. But then again that’s what the district has always done - hire consultants. This time the stakes are really high.

Expand full comment
ErrorError