Yeah just to be clear I only think it’s innocuous because all the candidates were there. If that wasn’t the case, the excluded one could have a case this was biased against them
Yeah just to be clear I only think it’s innocuous because all the candidates were there. If that wasn’t the case, the excluded one could have a case this was biased against them
I don't know if they'll be endorsing but yeah, you're not wrong here and that's basically what happened in Skokie too. I haven't heard a peep from OPAL this cycle, are they still around?
Yeah just to be clear I only think it’s innocuous because all the candidates were there. If that wasn’t the case, the excluded one could have a case this was biased against them
You were ok with her mentioning one candidate in her email? That seems worse to me than promoting the Kumba website.
Do you know if Kumba is going to endorse candidates? I have never heard of them, but she is telling people to check their website.
We have had private groups like this hold forums and then offer endorsements, like OPAL.
If this Kumba group is endorsing candidates, that would make it 100% non-innocuous.
I don't know if they'll be endorsing but yeah, you're not wrong here and that's basically what happened in Skokie too. I haven't heard a peep from OPAL this cycle, are they still around?