IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but is that suggestion in hopes of prison or some kind of financial reimbursement? If the latter, I think we'd have to find a way to quantify damages. Would be great to have an attorney actually speak on what's possible there, but given there are plenty of those in the community who likely read FG, it would be …
IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but is that suggestion in hopes of prison or some kind of financial reimbursement? If the latter, I think we'd have to find a way to quantify damages. Would be great to have an attorney actually speak on what's possible there, but given there are plenty of those in the community who likely read FG, it would be really surprising to me if we got this far without one chiming in if there were truly legal recourse.
The District has recouped money from him (like from the P-card expenses after he moved) but it's not clear how much he owed, what he owed for, or what percentage was collected. They haven't really ever given us a full public accounting of this stuff, which is just totally wild to me.
What's the upside for the board to do something that makes them look worse than they already have via FOIA Gras, RT, EN working to shed light on their missteps?
Oof, I wish that were true but every time I think we hit bottom something else comes out. It just seems like they'd be self-owning themselves by doing more of an audit. I could see Joey tossing it out there, based on some of his comments.
IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but is that suggestion in hopes of prison or some kind of financial reimbursement? If the latter, I think we'd have to find a way to quantify damages. Would be great to have an attorney actually speak on what's possible there, but given there are plenty of those in the community who likely read FG, it would be really surprising to me if we got this far without one chiming in if there were truly legal recourse.
The District has recouped money from him (like from the P-card expenses after he moved) but it's not clear how much he owed, what he owed for, or what percentage was collected. They haven't really ever given us a full public accounting of this stuff, which is just totally wild to me.
What's the upside for the board to do something that makes them look worse than they already have via FOIA Gras, RT, EN working to shed light on their missteps?
The upside is that there is no downside left!
Oof, I wish that were true but every time I think we hit bottom something else comes out. It just seems like they'd be self-owning themselves by doing more of an audit. I could see Joey tossing it out there, based on some of his comments.