I wholeheartedly agree with this. We can’t even rely on the board, who presumably represent us, to exercise any scrutiny over spending. The administration is free to create new high-level positions with nary a raised eyebrow. Meanwhile, much of corporate America is intimately familiar with hiring freezes and fiscal restraint. I would lov…
I wholeheartedly agree with this. We can’t even rely on the board, who presumably represent us, to exercise any scrutiny over spending. The administration is free to create new high-level positions with nary a raised eyebrow. Meanwhile, much of corporate America is intimately familiar with hiring freezes and fiscal restraint. I would love to see the board impose an upper limit on consultant spend and administrative staffing tied to enrollment.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. We can’t even rely on the board, who presumably represent us, to exercise any scrutiny over spending. The administration is free to create new high-level positions with nary a raised eyebrow. Meanwhile, much of corporate America is intimately familiar with hiring freezes and fiscal restraint. I would love to see the board impose an upper limit on consultant spend and administrative staffing tied to enrollment.
I would love to see a zero tolerance for new consultant hire in 2024 and 2025.
Also, is D65 projected to lose more students next year?