You say that the board can only use the lease certificates on construction and can't use operating budget funds. Not that the money is going to be there, but what happens if they say "screw it, lets tap into the general budget for the new school?"
They violate the Open Meetings Act all the time. They clearly have nothing but contempt for …
You say that the board can only use the lease certificates on construction and can't use operating budget funds. Not that the money is going to be there, but what happens if they say "screw it, lets tap into the general budget for the new school?"
They violate the Open Meetings Act all the time. They clearly have nothing but contempt for the public given their failure to hold a referendum and the consistent lies about the school cost. We are on our second superintendent with zero experience running a school district.
I think the working assumption is that they don't know what they are doing in terms of financing and management. I could see them just raiding the operations fund. Who is going to stop them?
Just to be clear, there is no evidence they violate the OMA “all the time”. If there was, I would be challenging it with the AG. I do have one case open with them on this, regarding the residency requirement. If you have evidence of more violations, my email is tom@foiagras.com
You say that the board can only use the lease certificates on construction and can't use operating budget funds. Not that the money is going to be there, but what happens if they say "screw it, lets tap into the general budget for the new school?"
They violate the Open Meetings Act all the time. They clearly have nothing but contempt for the public given their failure to hold a referendum and the consistent lies about the school cost. We are on our second superintendent with zero experience running a school district.
I think the working assumption is that they don't know what they are doing in terms of financing and management. I could see them just raiding the operations fund. Who is going to stop them?
Just to be clear, there is no evidence they violate the OMA “all the time”. If there was, I would be challenging it with the AG. I do have one case open with them on this, regarding the residency requirement. If you have evidence of more violations, my email is tom@foiagras.com