I suspect the last five years have been rife with open meetings act violations but it's basically impossible to prove with someone on the board bringing it up. For instance, I heard they discussed *me* in a closed session - which is allowed in some contexts but is a pretty rampant violation of the OMA. The distrust that the board has for…
I suspect the last five years have been rife with open meetings act violations but it's basically impossible to prove with someone on the board bringing it up. For instance, I heard they discussed *me* in a closed session - which is allowed in some contexts but is a pretty rampant violation of the OMA. The distrust that the board has for the voters and the general public is just absolutely wild. I've never seen anything like it.
I suspect the last five years have been rife with open meetings act violations but it's basically impossible to prove with someone on the board bringing it up. For instance, I heard they discussed *me* in a closed session - which is allowed in some contexts but is a pretty rampant violation of the OMA. The distrust that the board has for the voters and the general public is just absolutely wild. I've never seen anything like it.