17 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Peter  Schenck's avatar

That’s great insight Tom. I think for a well-run, squeaky clean district that would suffice.

Given how much we’re outspending better academically better performing Districts it begs the question, where did all the money go. For an organization with a history of feather-bedding including nepotism, running wild with company credit cards, $100,000 luxury vehicles for senior staff, $575,000 missing from bank accounts and even the proverbial free lunch it may be, just might be, perhaps finally time for a closer look. A full Forensic Audit.

Or not, if we just want to normalize this and pretend it’s all ok. Just go ahead with the next big tax hike and hold our nose at the ongoing mediocre academic results.

Expand full comment
smh's avatar
Mar 19Edited

I 100% agree with you, a full forensic audit and then let's go after the person(s) that started this whole mess, after all, it's tax payers money and we can't just turn a blind eye to this. It's disgusting and flat out wrong.

Expand full comment
ErrorError