This is good news. I never understood how she got this position. She had never worked in education before. I had asked her a basic data-oriented question about the "rate of change" at a public event and she didn't know what the term meant!
It is great that all these Horton-era dead-enders are leaving. However, the rot comes from the top. …
This is good news. I never understood how she got this position. She had never worked in education before. I had asked her a basic data-oriented question about the "rate of change" at a public event and she didn't know what the term meant!
It is great that all these Horton-era dead-enders are leaving. However, the rot comes from the top. You basically have the same board that hired Horton in place. The newer members have done basically zero to distinguish themselves as independent voices. And the old ones who didn't quit all won re-election.
They are in the process of doing a Horton 2.0 superintendent hire--totally in the dark without public scrutiny.
I have little hope things will get better at this point.
This is good news. I never understood how she got this position. She had never worked in education before. I had asked her a basic data-oriented question about the "rate of change" at a public event and she didn't know what the term meant!
It is great that all these Horton-era dead-enders are leaving. However, the rot comes from the top. You basically have the same board that hired Horton in place. The newer members have done basically zero to distinguish themselves as independent voices. And the old ones who didn't quit all won re-election.
They are in the process of doing a Horton 2.0 superintendent hire--totally in the dark without public scrutiny.
I have little hope things will get better at this point.
Pure nepotism. I used to sub for the TWI program and many "leaders" in that area couldn't even write correctly in Spanish 🤷🏻♀️