I agree that’s his strategy! I just think when it comes to debating policy, we should place a high probability on his threats being realized. In this case I think it was fair for you to include impoundment as *a* factor in issuing a referendum. It’s more prudent than alarmist in the context of scenario planning, particularly if we want t…
I agree that’s his strategy! I just think when it comes to debating policy, we should place a high probability on his threats being realized. In this case I think it was fair for you to include impoundment as *a* factor in issuing a referendum. It’s more prudent than alarmist in the context of scenario planning, particularly if we want to D65 to start actually being proactive as opposed to waiting for things to spiral out of control.
I agree that’s his strategy! I just think when it comes to debating policy, we should place a high probability on his threats being realized. In this case I think it was fair for you to include impoundment as *a* factor in issuing a referendum. It’s more prudent than alarmist in the context of scenario planning, particularly if we want to D65 to start actually being proactive as opposed to waiting for things to spiral out of control.