Yikes! What a wholly uncharitable take on my comment. I wasn't attacking candidates, I was simply commenting that
everyone's running to fix problems, and problems, by their very nature, are negative. The race is heavy, because we're about an inch away from a state takeover. It's also rather uncharitable to dismiss this entire post as basi…
Yikes! What a wholly uncharitable take on my comment. I wasn't attacking candidates, I was simply commenting that
everyone's running to fix problems, and problems, by their very nature, are negative. The race is heavy, because we're about an inch away from a state takeover. It's also rather uncharitable to dismiss this entire post as basic, when he spent like 2,000 words laying out a pragmatic, detailed plan for how the board can move forward. He also said he read five years' worth of Board books, which, I'm gonna take a wild guess and say probably no one else has done that. I also didn't see you apply your critique to any of the other candidates.
Hi Shawna, I didn’t accuse you of attacking anyone but also I’m not trying to be charitable. I’m asking specific questions to Andrew because I don’t agree with his specific approach, but I want to know more and make sure I have a fully formed opinion.
To me, reading five years of board books does not make you a qualified candidate for this particular election - but again, that’s just my opinion! We feel differently and will probably vote differently and that’s all good.
Yikes! What a wholly uncharitable take on my comment. I wasn't attacking candidates, I was simply commenting that
everyone's running to fix problems, and problems, by their very nature, are negative. The race is heavy, because we're about an inch away from a state takeover. It's also rather uncharitable to dismiss this entire post as basic, when he spent like 2,000 words laying out a pragmatic, detailed plan for how the board can move forward. He also said he read five years' worth of Board books, which, I'm gonna take a wild guess and say probably no one else has done that. I also didn't see you apply your critique to any of the other candidates.
Hi Shawna, I didn’t accuse you of attacking anyone but also I’m not trying to be charitable. I’m asking specific questions to Andrew because I don’t agree with his specific approach, but I want to know more and make sure I have a fully formed opinion.
To me, reading five years of board books does not make you a qualified candidate for this particular election - but again, that’s just my opinion! We feel differently and will probably vote differently and that’s all good.